Free CRE calculator

LTC / LTV Calculator

Loan-to-cost and loan-to-value from one set of inputs — and which one actually caps your loan.

Two leverage tests on one loan — LTC against what the deal costs, LTV against what it's worth. Lenders size to the lower-implied loan, so the higher ratio is the one that binds. Required: loan amount, total project cost, property value.

Binding leverage
conservativetypical ≤75%above ceiling

Enter the loan, total project cost, and property value to see LTC, LTV, and which one caps your loan.

UpsideIQ AI analysis Pro
What concerns me about this deal
Questions to ask the broker
Unlock the full AI read on your deal — free See a sample analysis
How it's calculated

LTC = loan ÷ total project cost (purchase + capex + closing + carry); LTV = loan ÷ property value. Stabilized lenders size to LTV (typically 60–75%); construction and bridge lenders size to LTC (~65–75%). Most underwrite to the lower of the two implied loans — i.e. the higher ratio is the binding constraint. On a value-add deal the two diverge, which is exactly when knowing the binder matters. The full UpsideIQ underwrite sizes debt against LTV, LTC, DSCR, and debt yield at once.

Pre-filled with a worked example — edit any field to run your own deal.

Built by LFO Capital's institutional CRE underwriting team · computed, not guessed — deterministic math, not an AI estimate · how we calculate →

See a full institutional AI deal analysis

This ratio is one number. Enter your email and we'll send a complete UpsideIQ deal analysis — 10-year DCF, reserves, refinance, exit, and a graded score on a real deal — alongside your calculator results. See what an institutional underwrite actually looks like. No spam.

A chatbot guesses the math. This is computed.

Two leverage tests, one loan

Every commercial loan is sized against more than one leverage test, and the two that matter most are loan-to-value and loan-to-cost. They look almost identical — a loan divided by a big number — but they answer different questions, and on the deals where they diverge, knowing which one binds is the difference between the proceeds you priced into your model and the smaller loan you actually get.

The two formulas

Loan-to-value (LTV) = loan ÷ property value. It asks how much you're borrowing against what the asset is worth, and it protects the lender from a borrower overpaying relative to the market. For stabilized commercial real estate, LTV ceilings typically run 60–75%, lower for riskier assets.

Loan-to-cost (LTC) = loan ÷ total project cost — purchase price plus every dollar of capex, closing, and carry. It asks how much you're borrowing against what the deal actually costs, and it keeps the sponsor's equity meaningfully in the deal through the riskiest phase, the renovation or build. Construction and bridge lenders size to LTC, commonly in the 65–75% range.

The lesser-of rule: which one binds

Here's the part that decides your proceeds: most lenders underwrite to the lower of the two implied loans. They compute the maximum loan LTV allows (ceiling × value) and the maximum LTC allows (ceiling × cost), and lend the smaller. With comparable ceilings, that means the higher ratio is the binding constraint — because the higher ratio sits against the smaller denominator, which caps the loan first. On a stabilized purchase where cost and value are close, the two barely differ. On a value-add or development deal they diverge sharply, and an LTV-passing loan can still get cut down by the LTC ceiling (or vice versa). The calculator above shows both ratios and flags which one binds, so you're never surprised at term-sheet time.

A worked example

Take a $7,000,000 loan on a deal that costs $10,000,000 all-in against a $9,500,000 value. LTC is 70.0% (7.0 ÷ 10.0); LTV is 73.7% (7.0 ÷ 9.5). The LTV ratio is higher, because value is the smaller denominator — so LTV is the binding constraint, and at a common ~75% ceiling it's the test that would cap the loan first. Flip the relationship — a deal that costs less than it's worth, the classic value-add where you create value above cost — and LTC becomes the higher ratio and the binding test. The point isn't which one is "usually" binding; it's that you have to compute both on every deal, because the binder flips with the cost-versus-value relationship.

What is a good LTC or LTV?

Lower is safer and higher is more capital-efficient, so "good" depends on which side of the table you're on and how risky the asset is. As a frame: stabilized core deals commonly clear at 60–70% leverage; value-add and bridge deals push to 70–75% on the binding test; above ~75–80% you're above standard ceilings and need a strong story — credit, location, sponsor track record — or you bring more equity. And leverage rarely binds alone: lenders also test DSCR and debt yield, and lend the smallest loan any of the four tests allows. A loan that clears LTV and LTC can still be sized down by coverage.

Read the full loan-to-cost and loan-to-value definitions and the LTV vs LTC guide, check coverage on the DSCR calculator, see the full loan-sizing stack on the metrics hub, and size the debt on your own deal in UpsideIQ. See pricing.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between LTC and LTV?

Loan-to-value (LTV) divides the loan by the property's value or price; loan-to-cost (LTC) divides the same loan by total project cost — purchase plus capex, closing, and carry. LTV measures leverage against what the asset is worth; LTC measures it against what you actually spend. On a stabilized purchase they're close; on a value-add or development deal they diverge.

Which one limits my loan — LTC or LTV?

Whichever implies the smaller loan. Lenders compute the max loan each test allows and lend the lower. With comparable ceilings the higher ratio binds, because it sits against the smaller denominator. So compute both on every deal — the binding test flips depending on whether cost is above or below value.

What is a good LTV for commercial real estate?

Stabilized commercial real estate typically finances at 60–75% LTV, lower for riskier or transitional assets. Lower leverage is safer; higher is more capital-efficient but amplifies losses on the way down. Above roughly 75–80% you're above standard ceilings and need a strong credit, location, or sponsor story.

What is a good LTC?

Construction and bridge lenders commonly cap loan-to-cost around 65–75%, keeping meaningful sponsor equity in the deal through the riskiest phase. A higher LTC means the lender is funding more of the cost and the sponsor has less skin in the game — which lenders resist most during a renovation or build.

Do lenders use LTC and LTV together?

Yes. Lenders run both and size to whichever implies the smaller loan, and they layer DSCR and debt yield on top — lending the smallest amount any test allows. A loan that clears both leverage tests can still be cut down by coverage, so all four matter when sizing proceeds.

Related calculators

Embed this calculator

Free for your site or blog — paste this snippet to drop in the live calculator. It links back here.

More embed options →

Analyze your own deals — free

Tell UpsideIQ your investment criteria once — every deal gets analyzed, graded, and flagged against YOUR targets, not a generic score.

← All calculators See pricing → Sample AI analysis → Read the guides → Glossary →